The same scorecard through time

Progress accelerated after 2023, but no common-core dimension has crossed into field-wide deliverability.

The rubric is fixed at the August 2026 ideal. Dates mark changes in public evidence, not annual averages. Exact cells are editorial synthesis, not normalized benchmark scores.

012345

Each lane repeats its dates so mobile readers do not need to remember a distant header.

Task and audience framing

2017020191202012022120232202422025220262Ideal4

Data, semantics, and provenance

2017120191202012022120232202432025320263Ideal4

Visual construction fidelity

2017120191202012022120232202422025320263Ideal4

Visual interpretation and reasoning

2017020190202012022220232202422025320263Ideal4

Integrity critique and uncertainty

2017120191202012022120231202422025220262Ideal4

Iterative steering and repair

2017120191202012022120232202432025320263Ideal4

Interaction, responsiveness, and accessibility

2017120191202012022120231202412025220262Ideal4

Reader and decision outcomes

2017020190202002022020230202412025120261Ideal5

Production efficiency, governance, and maintenance

2017020190202002022020230202412025120261Ideal4
2017–20

The substrate became programmable.

Declarative grammars, constraints, learned generation, and natural-language specifications made parts of construction inspectable. Evidence remained example-led.

2022–23

Understanding and LLM generation became repeatable.

Real-chart question answering and multi-stage LLM pipelines crossed into benchmarked capability, while outcome validation stayed absent.

2026

The frontier broadened sideways.

Professional, multilingual, multi-chart, document, state, replay, and judge-reliability tests expanded scope without closing the outcome and lifecycle gaps.