Proof standard
The exact data, semantic model, permissions, deployment, operating roles, acceptance record, incident path, and later recheck remain joined.
Analytics and BI leaders
Separate available controls from governed deployment.
For BI authors, platform owners, analytics leaders, and governance teams evaluating assistants inside real semantic, permission, and operating environments.
Decision to support
What can be approved for this data, decision surface, and operating model—and what evidence is still missing?
Working output
An approval packet that distinguishes available controls, locally verified behavior, operating authority, and unresolved deployment evidence.
Composed research
5 source sections, assembled for this decision.
These are the original sections from the visual research experiences, not summaries or reference cards. Expand each step to read it here, or open its stable page for direct linking.
01 · ContextContext-specific idealsHow do release gates change while the scorecard stays fixed?
Define acceptance for the actual data, roles, decisions, and operating environment.
Open this section as its own page →02 · LandscapeResearch and implementation landscapeWhere do the recurring mechanisms appear across systems, skills, and products?
Separate product controls and policy claims from a governed deployment receipt.
Open this section as its own page →03 · EvaluationWhat the benchmarks measureWhich task-and-grader result produced each score?
Use external scores only for the exact task-and-grader claim they support.
Open this section as its own page →04 · EvaluationA practical evaluationHow should the complete creator-to-artifact-to-reader episode be measured?
Freeze local semantic, permission, refusal, and recovery checks before comparison.
Open this section as its own page →05 · ContextContext and lifecycle modesHow should the common evidence spine change by role and lifecycle state?
Require actor-separated release, incident, repair, recheck, and ownership records.
Open this section as its own page →Ask before acting
Three questions that keep the route honest.
- 01
Which semantic model, permissions, data vintage, and user roles are inside the approval boundary?
- 02
Who can accept, refuse, suspend, repair, and independently recheck the deployed workflow?
- 03
Which claims are provider facts, local test results, operating evidence, or still unknown?
Focused analysis
Complete arguments to keep nearby.
- Five benchmark-validity gatesCheck whether a score can support a configuration decision.
- Benchmark libraryInspect task, grader, supported claim, and nonclaim for recurring evaluations.
Named evidence
Reference pages connected to this route.
- DashArenaA benchmark, browser executor, and human-calibrated judge for open-ended interactive dashboard generation.
- Dashboard2CodeA benchmark for reconstructing interactive Plotly Dash applications from screenshots, optional DOM, and interaction.
- VisEvalThe evaluation harness used by nvAgent for database-to-visualization composition.