Proof standard
The source, claim, data transformation, artifact, editorial acceptance, accessible delivery, correction path, and reader evidence remain attributable.
Newsrooms and public explainers
Carry source and editorial authority through to the reader.
For data journalists, graphics editors, newsroom developers, and public-interest communicators evaluating AI-assisted analysis and visual explanation.
Decision to support
Can this exact artifact be reproduced, accepted, delivered accessibly, understood by readers, and corrected when it changes?
Working output
A publication and correction plan that names what AI may assist, what editorial authority must inspect, and what readers still need tested.
Composed research
5 source sections, assembled for this decision.
These are the original sections from the visual research experiences, not summaries or reference cards. Expand each step to read it here, or open its stable page for direct linking.
01 · OrientationPurpose and audienceWhat is agentic visualization for?
Begin with the public claim, intended reader, stakes, and delivery setting.
Open this section as its own page →02 · Human evidenceReader experienceWhat happens when the audience encounters the delivered claim?
Distinguish comprehension, confidence, accessibility, trust, and later use.
Open this section as its own page →03 · SynthesisResearch synthesisWhat does current evidence establish—and what does it not?
Design review around demonstrated semantic, visual, interaction, and critic failures.
Open this section as its own page →04 · EvaluationA practical evaluationHow should the complete creator-to-artifact-to-reader episode be measured?
Keep editorial acceptance separate from mechanical checks and model judgments.
Open this section as its own page →05 · ContextContext and lifecycle modesHow should the common evidence spine change by role and lifecycle state?
Preserve publication, correction, recheck, and ownership as separate events.
Open this section as its own page →Ask before acting
Three questions that keep the route honest.
- 01
Can a reader or editor trace every consequential claim back to its source and transformation?
- 02
Has the exact delivered artifact been checked across devices, access paths, and interaction states?
- 03
Who owns correction, republication, disclosure, and reader-facing notice after a material change?
Focused analysis
Complete arguments to keep nearby.
- Benchmark crosswalkUse benchmarks to expose named risks without borrowing publication authority.
Named evidence
Reference pages connected to this route.
- ChartographyA deliberately difficult set of practitioner-authored professional chart-reading tasks.
- ChartQAProA realistic chart question-answering benchmark with conversational, hypothetical, fact-checking, and unanswerable cases.
- PolyChartQA: multi-chart figuresA multi-chart scientific-figure benchmark whose name collides with a separate multilingual chart benchmark.