Proof standard
The baseline, intervention, information advantage, execution trace, rendered artifact, failure states, recovery path, and acceptance outcome remain comparable.
Product and system builders
For product, engineering, and tool teams deciding between prompts, skills, structured intermediates, deterministic components, critics, and browser-level evaluation.
Decision to support
Proof standard
The baseline, intervention, information advantage, execution trace, rendered artifact, failure states, recovery path, and acceptance outcome remain comparable.
Working output
A bounded mechanism decision with one falsifiable local test, an observable failure surface, and a rollback or recovery path.
Composed research
These are the original sections from the visual research experiences, not summaries or reference cards. Expand each step to read it here, or open its stable page for direct linking.
Match each mechanism to the missing information or guarantee it is meant to add.
Open this section as its own page →Remove scaffolding that merely repeats capability the base system already has.
Open this section as its own page →Instrument semantic, visual, interaction, coordination, and recovery failures.
Open this section as its own page →Compare the complete rendered route under one task and acceptance contract.
Open this section as its own page →Bind the product mechanism to the permissions, users, stakes, and operating owner.
Open this section as its own page →Ask before acting
What exact information, state, or deterministic guarantee does the mechanism add?
Can the same task, budget, grader, and acceptance rule compare the baseline and intervention?
Are silent failure, retry cost, state loss, regression, and rollback observable on the finished surface?
Focused analysis
Named evidence